Why WWE Money in the Bank Has a Very Different Feel This Year
While WWE once had a Big Four of premium live events, that number has increased to five since Money in the Bank became a yearly event.
WWE has a "Big Four" premium live events in each year, but that number has arguably increased to five since Money in the Bank became an annual addition to the calendar.
This show has as much impact on the immediate future of WWE as the Royal Rumble and sometimes creates the even bigger surprises.
In recent years, though, Money in the Bank has felt like a concept running out of steam, becoming almost a burden on the brand rather than a boon.
However, the 2026 edition of MITB in New Orleans on Saturday feels different. But why? Well, it all starts with perception...
The last three Money in the Bank PLEs have been run under the creative focus of Triple H, who has focused on strong stars each year to win big.
The winners of the men's and women's Money in the Bank ladder matches are Damian Priest and Iyo Sky (2023), Drew McIntyre and Tiffany Stratton (2024), and Seth Rollins and Naomi (2025).
Other top names who have picked up big wins at these events include Cody Rhodes, Gunther, Sami Zayn and Becky Lynch.
The booking has been strong, and the winners regularly went on to play big roles in the company for years to come.
However, the feeling coming out of these shows was muted. Most of the cash-ins were completed within a month, and the other results felt secondary to building hype toward Survivor Series.
Most importantly, even with fresh names such as Sky and Stratton winning, it never felt like WWE had a plan to make the most of their status as Money in the Bank victors.
This year, WWE has presented a stacked line-up focused on the top stars of now and the future.
Roman Reigns is working a singles match at the show for the first time since 2021.
Stephanie Vaquer, Becky Lynch and Liv Morgan are competing in the most consequential women's non-ladder match since at least 2022.
Bronson Reed and Oba Femi are fighting for the right to be seen as the new top monster in WWE right now.
Most importantly, both MITB ladder matches are stacked, not with top names but top prospects.
The women's match especially is a fresh NXT-trained line-up including all first-time potential winners except Tiffany Stratton, who is still only 27 years old and on the rise.
The possibility of fresh stars emerging is high, and the air of this show feels different.
Money in the Bank should be the match that focuses most on the up-and-coming stars of WWE.
Bron Breakker, Trick Williams and Je'Von Evans highlight a fresh line-up of younger names. Even Penta (41) and Kevin Owens (42) may not be young anymore but are exciting new names near the top of the card.
Jacy Jayne, Roxanne Perez, Sol Ruca, Lola Vice and Lash Legend are all names that WWE has not seriously pushed yet with a decade of potential ahead of them that could be unlocked with a win.
The fact that Oba Femi is already established well enough to get a singles match on this card instead of throwing him into the ladder match speaks to WWE's new focus.
CM Punk and Roman Reigns are the main representatives of the old guard in WWE on the card, and that is only because they are the top two stars in the company right now.
WWE has a chance to make lasting statements on its direction with this show in a way Money in the Bank has not done in recent years.
The goal for Money in the Bank 2026 should be to make clear that multiple new stars are on the rise and taking the power from WWE's reliable veterans.
This is not the time to hold back. Bron Breakker, Roxanne Perez, Oba Femi, Stephanie Vaquer and others should be walking out with big wins.
Moreover, those not winning need clear direction that will carry them through the rest of the year.
With a strong foundation and massive potential, the right booking could show this night to be a true turning point in WWE history.
Carry that momentum forward, and fans will be eagerly awaiting WrestleMania 43 for its potential to solidify a new fresh focus for all of WWE.
Topics in this story
Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.