Skip to content
Gigantum.net
Tech

Artificial intelligence

1,930 stories

Anthropic published a report about investigating “unintended model actions” during “evaluations and internal use.”

The actions Anthropic observed from its Claude AI include “Claude submitting a sensitive form on a real website when it should not have,” and the company detailed how Claude gave Philadelphia police a fake tip about an unsolved homicide. Axios also says that, according to a State Department official, Anthropic contacted the department and said a model in testing submitted “19 non-immigrant visa applications in August and one application in May.” In a statement to Axios, the Trump administration’s Super Intelligence Force says that “SI companies must immediately disclose incidents involving their models and follow with swift, decisive action to remedy any and all harm.” [Link: Investigating unintended model actions in our evaluations and internal use | https://www.anthropic.com/research/investigating-unintended-model-actions | Anthropic]

Microsoft launches its new AI model for making decisions quickly.

Apparently, after large language models and agents, we’re now in the age of “decision models,” as Microsoft has announced Microsoft-Decision-1 just days after OpenAI highlighted its new Decisions API. The point of these models is to choose something quickly and efficiently, like figuring out which AI model to use or what is in an image being analyzed by AI, and Microsoft claims its new tech beat out the others in tests to determine their speed and accuracy. [Image: https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/10/microsoft-decision-1-stats.jpg?quality=90&strip=all]

Laura Reiley on Sam Altman’s “unsatisfying” Vanity Fair interview answer.

It was Reiley’s question for the OpenAI CEO about releasing logs from ChatGPT users who’ve taken their own lives that was nearly interrupted recently. Now she writes that while Altman was “gracious” to answer, she says he chose the wrong one: > Altman claiming the privacy high road is a little rich. Companies like Google, Meta, and now OpenAI earn revenue from advertising that depends on extensive use of personal information. And Altman’s assertion that experts “aren’t sure what to do” is either disingenuous or misinformed. Part of our collective mounting dread is that this technology is far outstripping the ability, access, and time required to study its effects on human beings. > Researchers have been saying loud and clear: We need user data and chatbot interactions to conduct research. If you or anyone you know is considering self-harm or needs to talk, contact the following people who want to help: In the US, text or call 988. Outside the US, contact https://www.iasp.info/.

OpenAI disrupted an Iranian influence campaign that published AI articles across a dozen publications.

One ChatGPT-written article landed in a local Florida newspaper under a fake “Ervin Hoskins” byline, as reported by The Washington Post: > OpenAI said that Hoskins was among seven bylines that appeared on the series of AI-generated articles, made by users who sent instructions to the chatbot in Persian. The operations appeared to be run by a commercial outfit as a “for-hire influence campaign,” the company said. OpenAI says it also banned Russian accounts linked to a fake “think tank” in Latin America.

Saturday, October 10, 2026

© 2026 Gigantum.net. Content gathered automatically from external sources; rights to each text belong to whoever originally published it.