Elon Musk has a 'failure warning' for these technology companies; says: Investors have already started betting against them
Elon Musk has warned that most “neoclouds”, startups that rent out computing power for artificial intelligence (AI), may not survive as access to funding
Elon Musk has warned that most “neoclouds”, startups that rent out computing power for artificial intelligence (AI), may not survive as access to funding becomes harder. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Musk said more than 200 such companies could face closures and consolidation, although a few may survive. He also said lenders have largely stopped providing money to companies that do not earn significant revenue outside AI data centres. In the post, Musk pointed to SpaceX’s ability to raise $40 billion in debt for graphics processing units (GPUs), saying its investment-grade status and revenue from Starlink and rocket launches helped it secure the funding.Elon Musk’s comments come in a reply to a post by Canadian-American venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya forecasting excess stranded compute in 2027 from disorganized, undercapitalized neoclouds and slow, bureaucratic hyperscalers prioritizing internal needs over third-party model companies.What are neocloudsNeoclouds are companies that provide cloud computing services mainly for artificial intelligence (AI) and other demanding computing tasks. They offer access to powerful chips, especially GPUs (graphics processing units), which are used to train and run AI models. Traditional cloud providers offer a wide range of services, from data storage and website hosting to databases and software tools. Neoclouds focus more narrowly on providing the computing power needed for AI workloads.Here’s what Chamath Palihapitiya said:“As someone with a portfolio of energized land assets here is what I am seeing:1. Neoclouds are disorganized and poorly capitalized. Some are definitely better than others however.2. Hyperscalers are intractable, bureaucratic organizations that take 3 months to do an NDA and want 18mo escrow periods. We built our portfolio by competing against these terms because of our speed and simplicity. The more future assets orgs like ours win, the bigger the problem for the hyperscalers downstream (see 3).3. There are delays in the existing pipeline that will catch people off guard in 2027. Hyperacalers will (obviously) react by focusing on their own internal compute needs over any third party. If the third party is a model company, they will tell them to go through their model router where they will also take a non-trivial vig. Them telling Ant they have no compute for them (rumored in Ant’s S-1) if true is a huge tell that this is already happening.All of this is to say that it does look like there will be a lot of partially stranded compute and compute sitting in inventory in 2027 than is currently forecasted. This is bought and paid for but effectively underearning (below total cost of capital) or collecting dust. We see this as true for everyone - model companies, hyperscalers, neoclouds except ONE (you can guess which one).This dislocation will benefit two kinds of orgs: the non-bureaucratic big scalers who can build industrial scale quickly and the nimble, well capitalized players feeding them.2027 will be a turbulent year because it will clear out a bunch of wrong/bad bets. It will also be a consolidation year for a few.”You use AI every day. Now get your AI Quotient. Take the AIQ test.
Topics in this story
Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.