College Football Playoff committee completely screwed up initial CFP rankings reveal

The first College Football Playoff rankings should clarify how the committee separates contenders. Tuesday's reveal instead created three difficult questions about the value of winning, head-to-head results and the distance between otherwise competitive teams.

Alabama at No. 5, UCLA at No. 8 and Ohio State at No. 12 form the clearest case against the initial order. Each placement has a defense. Together, they make the committee's priorities difficult to follow.

Alabama's advantage over Tennessee is excessive

The Alabama Crimson Tide and Tennessee Volunteers both hold 6-2 records, yet the committee ranked Alabama eight spots above the team that defeated it 26-10 on October 17.

Watch sports LIVE with fuboTV (free trial)

Tennessee held the Crimson Tide to 201 yards and forced four turnovers. That performance deserves substantial weight when comparing teams with identical overall records.

Alabama has an answer. Its victories over No. 6 Kentucky and No. 21 South Carolina strengthen its profile. Tennessee lost to South Carolina and No. 7 Texas, giving the committee legitimate reasons to distinguish their overall schedules.

Those differences explain a debate. They do not convincingly explain eight positions. Tennessee should be much closer to Alabama , particularly when its strongest victory came directly against the team receiving a potential home playoff game.

UCLA deserves more credit for remaining unbeaten

The UCLA Bruins are 8-0, but five teams with losses separate them from unbeaten, top-ranked Miami. Two of those teams, Alabama and Texas, have lost twice.

An undefeated record does not automatically establish a superior resume. Opponent quality matters, and UCLA's schedule warrants scrutiny.

Still, the Bruins won 17-15 at Oregon , which the committee ranked No. 23. They have both a perfect record and a road victory against a currently ranked opponent.

That combination deserves more credit than eighth. The committee can reward difficult schedules without making an unbeaten Power conference team's successful results feel secondary to opportunities other teams failed to convert.

Ohio State's win over Indiana deserves greater weight

The Indiana Hoosiers are 8-1 and fourth. The Ohio State Buckeyes are 6-2 and 12th, despite winning 19-15 in Bloomington on October 17.

Ohio State's subsequent 30-18 loss at USC matters . So does quarterback Julian Sayin's unavailability. The committee can consider injuries and evaluate the entire season.

But Indiana's only defeat came at home against Ohio State. That direct comparison should keep the teams closer, even if the Hoosiers retain the higher ranking.

The committee must weigh the entire season, but these results deserve more influence. Tennessee and Ohio State should sit closer to the teams they defeated, and UCLA's unbeaten record warrants a higher ranking. The initial reveal leaves those judgments open to fair criticism.