Skip to content

Thursday, September 24, 2026

Gigantum.net
World

An Alabama man fought a power company over a 74-mile transmission line planned across his 416-acre retirement property; after crews moved within 500 yards, a judge temporarily blocked them from entering

A landowner in Shelby County, Alabama, has won a temporary court order stopping utility crews from clearing land on his 416-acre retirement property.

· 702 words

A landowner in Shelby County, Alabama, has won a temporary court order stopping utility crews from clearing land on his 416-acre retirement property. The order has paused construction work on part of a major regional power project. Circuit Judge Jonathan A. Spann issued a preliminary injunction blocking Alabama Power from entering Fenn Church's property. The utility plans to build a 125-foot-wide right of way for a new 74-mile power line. The court order requires Church to post a $10,000 bond while his larger legal challenge moves through the courts. The ruling stopped power company contractors who had already started clearing trees and earth about 500 yards from Church's property line in Calera. According to local television station WVTM 13, Judge Spann said Church could face immediate and irreparable harm if crews continued working before the dispute received a final ruling. The court found that Church was likely to succeed in claims that Alabama Power did not follow required procedures before starting condemnation proceedings, especially rules about the timing and content of its final offer letters.Standing firm against eminent domainChurch bought the 416-acre farm in Calera four years ago with plans to build a retirement home. The property contains old-growth trees, wetlands, and Buxahatchee Creek. After the two sides failed to reach an agreement, Church rejected three separate purchase offers and Alabama Power began condemnation proceedings under state eminent domain laws. Court records show that the planned route would divide Church's land into six separate parcels. It would also give the utility access to his main private driveway for heavy equipment. Reporting by 1819 News showed that Church proposed other routes. One option would move the line 200 yards and use existing, cleared utility easements nearby. The utility rejected the proposed changes. Church publicly called the fight a "David and Goliath situation" as he worked to protect his property rights, local wildlife, and privacy. His legal battle later received wider national attention after country music singer John Rich promoted his cause on social media.Flaws identified in utility proceduresDuring a two-day hearing in Shelby County, lawyers presented evidence about how Alabama Power handled its condemnation notices. According to the written court order published by the Trussville Tribune, Judge Spann noted that Church received the formal final offer letters only after Alabama Power had already filed its condemnation lawsuit. The court found that this timing denied the landowner certain rights provided by state law. The judge also said Church was likely to succeed in arguments that the selected route and access roads were arbitrary and capricious. The court said utility planners did not properly consider future land use, possible development, or small changes to the route that could have avoided major damage to the property. Alabama Power engineers testified during the hearing that the 74-mile transmission project, running from Autaugaville to East Pelham, is intended to reduce strain on the electrical grid and improve regional power reliability. The company said contractors needed access to Church's land by October to meet a planned May 2027 completion date. However, Judge Spann wrote that the larger project remains on schedule. He said Alabama Power can continue work on other available sections of the route while Church's lawsuit is being decided.Protecting private property rightsAlabama Power says its policy is to reach voluntary agreements with property owners whenever possible. The company uses court-supervised condemnation only when negotiations fail. In a public statement about the lawsuit, Alabama Power said: "We understand that property is personal. We have demonstrated our commitment to treating property owners fairly and respectfully throughout this process." Despite those assurances, Church raised concerns in court filings about Alabama Power's ability to lease easement access to third-party telecommunications companies. Such an arrangement could allow outside traffic to use his private driveway. After the judge issued the preliminary injunction, Church described the order as an important victory for private property owners facing utility land seizures. The preliminary injunction will remain in place while the court sets a date for hearing Church's main lawsuit, which challenges the validity of the condemnation. The court's order says Alabama Power cannot enter Church's property unless and until the court orders otherwise.You use AI every day. Now get your AI Quotient. Take the AIQ test.

Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.