Skip to content

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Gigantum.net
NFL

"Women reporters will have a harder time": How one NFL scandal weaponized suspicion against women journalists who had nothing to do with it

NFL News: Mike Vrabel is back to coaching football. The New England Patriots are preparing for 2026. And for most people inside the league, the offseason drama .

· 674 words

Mike Vrabel is back to coaching football. The New England Patriots are preparing for 2026. And for most people inside the league, the offseason drama surrounding Vrabel and former Athletic reporter Dianna Russini has faded into the background. But for a number of women who cover the NFL for a living, the fallout from that scandal has not gone anywhere. It has quietly reshaped how they do their jobs, who they feel comfortable talking to, and how much extra caution they now need to exercise just to do basic reporting work.Why are NFL women reporters saying source-building has become harder after the Vrabel-Russini scandal?The mechanics of sports journalism are built on access. Reporters need sources. Sources mean informal conversations, coffee meetings, sideline chats, late-night texts after a draft pick. None of that is unusual. It is the job.What has changed, according to multiple women reporters who spoke to ESPN, is that those ordinary interactions now carry a different weight. One assistant coach told a female reporter he would rather not meet her for coffee because he did not want people drawing conclusions about it after everything that happened with Vrabel and Russini. That is not a small thing. That is a gatekeeper closing a door that was already narrow to begin with.Another reporter said NFL personnel reached out to her this spring with a direct warning: "Women reporters will have a harder time at the scouting combine." The combine is one of the most important networking events of the football calendar. Losing ground there is a real professional cost.Four reporters told ESPN they feel they now have to be more deliberate about routine interactions. One said she has started telling her editor when she meets with team personnel, simply because she worries someone might photograph the meeting and it might be misread. These are the calculations that male reporters are not making.What makes it more painful is who was at the center of it. Vrabel had made a visible effort to treat women in the press corps with more respect than many of his peers. He gave the first question at news conferences to veteran female reporters, a habit he brought with him from Tennessee."It really [expletive] sucks that this came from someone who a lot of us thought approached things differently than his peers," one reporter who has covered Vrabel told ESPN. "It's just unfortunate because it felt like he understood there are challenges that women in the business face and was doing one small bit to try and push back on it."That context makes the irony hard to ignore. The one coach many of these reporters considered an ally is now the reason some of them feel more exposed than before.What happened to Dianna Russini and Mike Vrabel, and why did only one of them lose their career?Photos of Vrabel and Russini together at a resort in Sedona, Arizona, surfaced in April. Both said the images were taken out of context. Russini described a group outing. Vrabel called the suggestion of anything improper laughable. Within two weeks, Russini had resigned from The Athletic. Vrabel briefly left the Patriots during the NFL Draft to seek counseling and then came back.The Athletic launched an internal investigation that ran five months. It concluded that Russini's undisclosed relationship with Vrabel violated newsroom standards, though it found little evidence that her coverage was biased. She was still gone. He was still coaching.Vrabel went on to lead New England to the Super Bowl in his first season and enters 2026 with the Patriots circled as contenders again. For him, the story is essentially over.For the women who cover his team and the rest of the league, it is still unfolding in quieter, less visible ways. Every coffee meeting that does not happen, every source who pulls back, every extra email to an editor before a normal conversation with a coach, those are the real costs. They are not dramatic. They do not make headlines. But they compound.Get the latest Sports News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.

Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.