Skip to content
Gigantum.net
More sport

Dylan Larkin Trade Rumor: Bruins Veteran and Draft Pick Floated in Potential Red Wings Deal

A source has floated Pavel Zacha, Mason Lohrei or a draft pick in a potential Dylan Larkin trade with Boston. Would Detroit accept?

· 590 words

The Dylan Larkin trade saga has taken another interesting turn, and the Boston Bruins remain a team worth watching.

While the Detroit Red Wings continue searching for an acceptable return for their former captain, a source has floated a potential trade framework involving veteran center Pavel Zacha , defenseman Mason Lohrei , or a first-round draft pick.

There is a catch, of course. Actually, there are several.

According to reporting from James Murphy of The Sick Podcast , Boston has been pushing harder to enter the Larkin sweepstakes. However, the Bruins reportedly have no interest in surrendering prized young center James Hagens, a player Detroit is believed to covet.

That raises an obvious question: Could Boston satisfy the Red Wings without sacrificing one of its most promising young players?

A Potential Dylan Larkin Trade Framework Involving Pavel Zacha

Murphy's reporting included an intriguing suggestion from an NHL source regarding what Boston might offer instead of Hagens.

The source wondered whether Zacha, accompanied by Lohrei or a first-round selection, could provide enough value to get Detroit interested.

Importantly, this was a hypothetical framework raised by a source, not confirmation that Boston has submitted such an offer .

Zacha, 29, is an established NHL center who could immediately help fill the enormous hole Larkin would leave behind. He also carries some risk, considering he is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent following the 2026-27 season.

Detroit would presumably want some assurance that Zacha would remain beyond this season before considering him a significant piece of the return.

Lohrei presents a different kind of opportunity. The young defenseman could potentially become part of Detroit's long-term blue line, while a first-round pick would offer additional flexibility as the organization evaluates its future.

But would Zacha and one additional asset really be enough?

The Red Wings are in an uncomfortable position, but that does not mean they should accept a disappointing return simply to end the drama.

As we previously explained when examining a different hypothetical Bruins trade involving Larkin , Detroit must evaluate not just the number of assets coming back, but whether those pieces can meaningfully improve the franchise.

Larkin is 30 years old and remains under contract through the 2030-31 season with an $8.7 million annual cap hit.

That is a significant commitment for any acquiring team, but it also means Detroit would be surrendering an established center with several years remaining on his contract.

Zacha could help immediately. Lohrei could provide longer-term upside. A first-round pick would be valuable.

But none individually replaces what Larkin has provided.

And if Boston refuses to include Hagens, Detroit should seriously consider whether another team can offer a more attractive package.

Of course, there is another rather important problem.

Boston reportedly remains outside Larkin's list of acceptable trade destinations.

According to The Hockey News' November 6 roundup , the Red Wings have been unable to find a satisfactory deal among Larkin's approved destinations and would prefer that he expand his list.

And as we previously covered when examining the potential Thanksgiving turning point in Larkin's trade standoff , both sides appear unwilling to make significant concessions.

Boston might have the assets to interest Detroit.

But until Larkin approves the Bruins as a destination, any proposed package remains academic.

For now, the Zacha scenario offers another look at what a potential Boston deal might involve.

The bigger question is whether Detroit would be getting enough in return to justify finally moving on from Larkin.

And that's a question Shawn Horcoff cannot afford to get wrong.

Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.

Saturday, November 7, 2026

© 2026 Gigantum.net. Content gathered automatically from external sources; rights to each text belong to whoever originally published it.