Mohammad Rizwan gambling and betting allegations: Pakistan star knocks on ICC door amid NCCIA investigation

Pakistan star Mohammad Rizwan has approached the ICC's Anti-Corruption Unit for procedural clarity amid an NCCIA investigation.

The move follows the Lahore High Court rejecting his petition challenging the agency's jurisdiction.

No findings of wrongdoing have been announced against Rizwan or Imam-ul-Haq at this stage.

Mohammad Rizwan asks for help from the ICC

Mohammad Rizwan's turbulent few weeks since Pakistan's tour of England have escalated into an international governance question, with the wicketkeeper-batter now seeking answers directly from cricket's global anti-corruption authority.

It marks a significant shift for a player who, across more than a decade and close to 250 international appearances, had never previously faced allegations connected to illegal betting or gambling.

The move follows a setback in Pakistan's domestic courts. Rizwan had approached the Lahore High Court to challenge the jurisdiction of the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency to investigate him at all, but Chief Justice Aalia Neelum declined to intervene, directing him instead to respond to the agency's notice through the established process.

His lawyer, Qazi Umair Ali, had argued in that hearing that the ICC's Anti-Corruption Unit, not a domestic cybercrime agency, was the appropriate forum for any corruption-related allegation involving an international cricketer.

With that argument rejected domestically, Rizwan has now taken the same underlying question to the ICC itself, seeking clarity on whether cricket's own anti-corruption machinery was ever engaged in a process that has already seen his mobile phone seized, transported from England to Pakistan, and subjected to forensic examination.

What Mohammad Rizwan has asked the ICC to clarify

According to Geo News , Rizwan submitted his request through the ICC ACU's online portal, and the approach has been described as a request for procedural guidance rather than a formal complaint against any individual or organisation.

Specifically, he has asked whether the ICC's Anti-Corruption Unit or the England and Wales Cricket Board's own anti-corruption authorities were aware of, or involved in, the seizure of his phone while he was in England.

He has also sought guidance on his own responsibilities should he be required to cooperate with anti-corruption investigators again in future, alongside asking whether the entire chain of custody, from the seizure itself through to the cross-border transfer and forensic analysis, complied with the ICC's own Anti-Corruption Code.

Under that code, if any player from a member country is suspected of a breach, the ICC's unit is meant to conduct its own inquiry and keep the relevant board informed throughout.

Whether that protocol was followed in Rizwan's case remains genuinely unclear. PTI has reported that it is not established whether the PCB itself formally suspects Rizwan of any wrongdoing, or whether it notified the ICC ACU of the matter at any stage, a gap in the public record that sits at the heart of what Rizwan is now asking the governing body to clarify.

It is worth restating plainly what has and has not happened here. The NCCIA has not announced any conclusion establishing that Rizwan or Imam-ul-Haq engaged in illegal betting, gambling or corrupt cricketing activity, and Geo News reported earlier this week that an initial examination of the seized phones had not revealed anything significant, even as a deeper forensic process continues.

The investigation originated from allegations of dressing-room information leaks during Pakistan's tour, with investigators also examining financial transactions around the same period, but no formal finding of misconduct has been made public against either player.

Why the procedural question matters regardless of the eventual outcome

Rizwan's approach to the ICC is a sensible one on its own terms, since a player facing scrutiny of this nature has every right to understand which body has jurisdiction and whether the correct chain of process was followed before his personal device was seized and sent abroad for analysis.

That question would matter even if the investigation ultimately clears him entirely, because a flawed process undermines confidence in the outcome either way. The wider concern is one of transparency rather than guilt or innocence.

A domestic cybercrime agency taking the lead on what appears, at least in part, to be a cricket integrity matter, without clarity on whether the sport's own anti-corruption unit was ever looped in, is an unusual arrangement that Pakistan's board has yet to explain publicly.

Until the PCB or the ICC clarifies exactly how this investigation has been run, the procedural questions Rizwan is asking are likely to attract as much attention as whatever the NCCIA eventually concludes.

For all the latest cricket news, opinion, and commentary and to share your voice, head to our Facebook , Instagram, and X (Twitter) pages.