Skip to content

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Gigantum.net
Basketball

5 takeaways from the NBA's punishment of the Clippers: By dropping a sledgehammer, Adam Silver squares off against the league's richest owner

Here are five takeaways in the aftermath of the NBA's punishment of the Los Angeles Clippers.

· 2,631 words

Adam Silver didn't just drop the hammer on the Los Angeles Clippers. He busted out the sledgehammer and called in the wrecking ball for good measure.

Make no mistake about it, the commissioner sent a message on Wednesday. Not just to the Clippers. He cc'd the entire NBA and anyone who dared to think about the words, "cap circumvention."

Among the league's punishments to the Clippers after an investigation found that they broke league rules in order to pay Kawhi Leonard under the table: a $30 million fine; the loss of five first-round picks beginning in 2029; one-year suspensions for owner Steve Ballmer and top business executive Gillian Zucker; and a six-month suspension for top basketball executive Lawrence Frank. The team will also be subject to a compliance and monitoring program for the next five years.

For his part in the scheme, Leonard will be fined $700,000 and his former representative, Dennis Robertson, will be banned from league business activities for five years.

Leonard and Robertson will be fine. This was all about punishing Ballmer, the richest owner in sports, and hitting him where it hurts.

Here are my five takeaways in the aftermath of Wednesday's news.

1. Steve Ballmer has two strikes. Next one, he will be out.

Don't forget, this isn't the first time Ballmer has been punished for cap circumvention. In 2015, the NBA fined the Clippers $250,000 for breaking league rules by offering an impermissible endorsement deal for DeAndre Jordan in free agency. Obviously, Ballmer didn't learn his lesson.

Silver and his lawyers had to have known that any monetary punishment wasn't going to change Ballmer's ways. Indeed, the former Microsoft mogul won't lose a minute of sleep over the monetary hit. A $30 million fine for someone worth $150 billion (Forbes estimates $152.7 billion, to be exact) is the equivalent of a $200 fine for someone worth $1 million. The money was never going to be the deterrent in something like this.

Yes, losing the five first-round picks will hurt basketball operations, for sure. But the thing that will hurt Ballmer and the Clippers the most?

It's Ballmer's one-year ban. That pain has nothing to do with basketball or money. That has to do with power. Silver locked the king out of his castle. Which, as commissioner, is well within his right. In 2000, David Stern, Silver's predecessor and mentor, also banned Minnesota Timberwolves owner Glen Taylor for a year for cap circumvention regarding free agent Joe Smith.

Silver took a page out of Stern's book and did what many around the league didn't think he would do: He stood up to the owner he famously ushered into the NBA in the first place and told him in no uncertain terms that no owner is bigger than the league.

That one-year ban, above all else, is what will dissuade other owners and executives from engaging in cap circumvention. If he did it to Ballmer …

Ballmer is not happy with the verdict and you can tell from the team's official statement issued moments after the news broke:

We vehemently reject the NBA's findings, which are the result of a heavily biased investigation seeking to justify a predetermined narrative rather than facts and evidence. What the league told us privately differs from what it announced today publicly, and they have not held themselves close to the standard Commissioner Silver set at the start of this investigation to ensure it's [sic] fairness and accuracy. For the past year, we cooperated fully and in good faith and we will now fight just as hard to demonstrate our innocence. We intend to vigorously challenge these findings and penalties through every avenue available to us and look forward to an ethical and impartial arbitration process.

We vehemently reject the NBA's findings, which are the result of a heavily biased investigation seeking to justify a predetermined narrative rather than facts and evidence. What the league told us privately differs from what it announced today publicly, and they have not held themselves close to the standard Commissioner Silver set at the start of this investigation to ensure it's [sic] fairness and accuracy.

For the past year, we cooperated fully and in good faith and we will now fight just as hard to demonstrate our innocence. We intend to vigorously challenge these findings and penalties through every avenue available to us and look forward to an ethical and impartial arbitration process.

We're all waiting for that. We've been waiting for a year. Ever since Pablo Torre broke the story about Kawhi Leonard's no-show contract with Aspiration on Sept. 3, 2025, the public has been waiting for something — anything — to justify all of the reported under-the-table dealings and clear the air. I fully recommend watching the now FOURTEEN-part investigation with Torre, Amin Elhassan and David Samson on Pablo Torre Finds Out, for which they've already won a Pulitzer Prize for audio reporting.

In its initial response to PTFO, the Clippers said the allegations of cap circumvention were "provably false." The NBA evidently determined otherwise. Ballmer sat down for an ESPN interview last September and said he was conned. The NBA evidently determined otherwise.

By dropping the sledgehammer and wrecking ball on the Clippers, the NBA evidently found PTFO's investigation to be credible and Ballmer's testimony on ESPN in early September to be incredibly dubious, if not downright deceitful. The published 35-page investigation summary by Wachtell, Lipton, Rozen and Katz law firm outlines plenty of documentation and behaviors that directly contradict Ballmer's assertion that he and the Clippers were innocent of any wrongdoing. Among the many details the investigation uncovered: the finding that the Clippers were paying out millions of dollars worth of "consulting fees" to third parties once they inked endorsement deals with Leonard, companies he never publicly endorsed.

Silver banning Ballmer for a year should be considered way more punitive than Taylor's one-year ban. Taylor wasn't demonstrably beating his chest during games yelling like a diehard fan. He wasn't on the Jumbotron and the TV screen throughout the games. Taylor wasn't sitting courtside with President Barack Obama and Bill Gates as his guests.

Now that Mark Cuban sold his majority stake in the Dallas Mavericks, Ballmer may be the most active and front-facing NBA owner in the game. Ballmer was very much part of the Clippers product, and he made himself a part of it, front and center. Silver and the NBA knew that in its adjudication and still went forward with it.

The NBA didn't cross the Donald Sterling line and ban Ballmer for life like it did with the disgraced previous owner in 2014. But if Ballmer attempts to circumvent the cap a third time, my belief is Silver will have no choice but to remove him as an owner. Read between the lines in Wednesday's punishment and it's hard to see it happening any other way.

2. This is a big win for the integrity of the league

From a legal sense, the 2025-26 season was a nightmare for the NBA.

Less than two months after the Kawhi scandal erupted, the NBA was shook to its core by the FBI announcing federal indictments for illegal sports gambling and poker activity involving Hall of Famer Chauncey Billups and former NBA player and coach Damon Jones as part of a wide-ranging, far-reaching scheme that named 31 defendants. NBA players Terry Rozier and Malik Beasley are also ensnared in the FBI's web. Billups, Rozier and Beasley have all maintained their innocence and await trial while Jones and many others have pleaded guilty.

Beyond the gambling scandal — which should absolutely not be tossed aside lightly — the Aspiration scandal stood as Silver's biggest pressure test of power. Speaking for myself as a media member, the Kawhi Leonard investigation was the topic du jour amongst journalists and insiders at every NBA gathering over the past year. Questions hung over the league throughout the season, including NBA All-Star Weekend in Ballmer's building, Intuit Dome. Would Silver have the stomach to hold Ballmer accountable? Would the league's independent investigation into the richest owner be legit?

At the heart of it all: Can we trust the NBA to do the right thing?

The immediate reaction in the NBA world was a resounding yes. At least in this case. The NBA could have let Ballmer skirt the rules and get away with it. The organization certainly believes it should have gotten off scot free. But given the mountains of evidence (literally piles of it on Torre's desk), the NBA felt Ballmer and the team's illegal actions were beyond the pale.

With the Donaghy scandal that rocked the NBA two decades ago and the ongoing gambling scandals amid sportsbook business ties, the league was in danger of facing an integrity crisis that would cripple the league. The Ballmer punishment was Silver's way of saying that the rules are there for a reason. Break them at your own peril. Even if you're worth more money than just about every NBA owner combined.

As a media member and fan of the game, I'm glad the league is attempting to uphold the integrity of the game. It's all we have.

3. Kawhi Leonard could win a title this year

Just for kicks, Leonard's statement should be read side-by-side to the Clippers. Ballmer's team issued a fiery response and seemed to be threatening legal action against the NBA by saying they're going to fight "through every avenue available to us."

Meanwhile, Leonard owned up to it, accepted the punishment and went on his way. Presumably, the Toronto trade will now be finalized (Kawhi said "As I return to Toronto …") and the former NBA Finals MVP will join Scottie Barnes in a quest to bring Canada its second NBA title.

The Raptors should be thrilled with this ruling. Leonard was not suspended and they don't have to deal with the Uncle Dennis headaches anymore, which is no small thing. Remember, the Raptors reported Robertson's illegal asks to the league back in 2019 and the league decided not to levy any punishments on Leonard then. Now, they get Leonard following an All-NBA season in which I rated him as a top-five player.

The Raptors are going to be a nasty foe next season. Under coach Darko Rajaković, the feisty team finished 10 games above .500 last season armed with the sixth-best defense in the NBA. The defense didn't hold up in the postseason as the Cleveland Cavaliers' starpower took out the Raptors in Game 7. Oh, the Raptors need starpower? Enter the best player in team history, Kawhi Leonard.

Granted, Leonard may succumb to Father Time as he enters his age-35 season. The knee issues could bark up again. But the upside is worth the risk. Not only has there been a new NBA champion in each of the past eight years, but that's also true for the Eastern Conference champ over that same time. The Raptors know this history very well. The team to break up the Cavaliers' four-year reign atop the East in 2019 was the Raptors themselves.

The Raptors are a longshot, to be sure. As of Wednesday night, after the punishment, BetMGM has Toronto currently listed at +3000, tied with the Detroit Pistons and Miami Heat for ninth-most likely team to hoist the Larry O'Brien Trophy in 2027. Crazier things have happened. Like, say, Adam Silver banning Steve Ballmer.

OK, now to the basketball stuff. Can you imagine if you're Keaton Wagler, right now? The Clippers' No. 5 pick in the 2026 draft was not sucked into the vortex of NBA's punishments because — and if there's a silver lining for the Clippers, it's this one — the league's investigation took so damn long that it wasn't able to levy the punishment in time to bar the Clippers from being able to draft the Illinois phenom in the lottery.

At the trade deadline, the Clippers traded Ivica Zubac and Kobe Brown to the Indiana Pacers for Bennedict Mathurin, Isaiah Jackson, the 2026 first-round pick (protected 1-4 and 10-30), a future 2029 first-round pick and a second-round pick. As part of the punishments, Wagler can play, but the 2029 pick acquired in the deal is gone and won't be returned to the Pacers, Zach Lowe reported.

It's not clear how the Raptors picks that were agreed to be sent to LA in the Leonard deal will be handled. The Clippers were set to receive the Raptors' 2031 and 2033 first-round picks in the transaction, but the NBA has stripped the Clippers of their picks in 2029 through 2033. We'll see how the NBA rules on the Toronto draft capital.

A year ago, in light of the investigation and possible punishments that the NBA could issue, I suggested that the Clippers should trade their future first-round picks for star players. Doing so would make it trickier for the NBA to hand out punishments as they chase a championship. If the Clippers mortgaged their future and traded their draft capital for say, now-traded stars like Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jaylen Brown and LaMelo Ball, how could the NBA pull them off the floor? Would they vacate a championship, if it came to that?

Instead, the Clippers shockingly went the other way and shed stars in order to add first-round picks. They traded Leonard, Zubac and James Harden. And now they have neither stars nor (many) picks.

But they do have Wagler, who is the point guard of the Clippers' very bleak future. Even though the 19-year-old didn't ask for any of this, he stands as the only Clippers first-round pick the team will stand to have for the foreseeable future, and he'll have to carry that weight throughout his tenure with the asset-bankrupt Clippers.

Not many tears will be shed for Wagler, who will make about $10 million in his rookie season to play professional basketball. But like Anthony Davis in the Luka Dončić trade, players often unfairly bear the fallout of their bosses' forsaken decisions. Davis didn't last in Dallas long, but the future of the Clippers is in Wagler's hands way more than it was yesterday. Though Darius Garland and Brandon Ingram are the placeholder stars that will suit up for the Clippers next season, Wagler is the innocent bystander that will be burdened by the Clippers' lack of future firepower.

If you thought this was the end of the Kawhi Leonard scandal, don't hold your breath. It should be mentioned that the NBA's statement brought to light a very significant detail: "The NBA and the NBPA have entered into an agreement confirming these penalties are final and binding on all parties."

Case closed! Right? Not so fast. The NBPA isn't going to fight this ruling and Leonard is accepting the fine, but the Clippers ostensibly have another "avenue" to pursue: court — and not the basketball one.

We'll see if the Clippers decide to fight this in America's judicial system. In doing so, Ballmer would be following in the footsteps of his predecessor. After Silver banned Donald Sterling for life after a racist recording was made public, Sterling sued the league for damages exceeding $1 billion, saying the league's punishments were "draconian."

A federal judge dismissed Sterling's suit in 2016.

There's another precedent I should raise here. In the Joe Smith fallout, the NBA did eventually return two first-round picks back to Minnesota for its subsequent good behavior. The big difference though is that Glen Taylor accepted the league's punishment and played nice. The Clippers, through Wednesday's red-hot comments, very much are not accepting the league's penalty.

Maybe Ballmer will learn Sterling's lesson and decide not to bring a lawsuit against the NBA. Then again, it's clear he didn't learn his original cap circumvention lesson from 2015 and here we are.

Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.