PBE vs. RSPH: Is a Biotech ETF or Equal-Weight Healthcare ETF the Better Choice for Investors?
PBE offers higher income and stronger returns, while RSPH provides broader diversification with lower costs and drawdown risk.
Healthcare investors often choose between targeting high-growth sub-sectors or capturing the broader market.
The Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF (NYSEMKT:PBE) provides a concentrated approach to the biotech industry, while the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPH) offers broader exposure with lower volatility. Here's how the two compare on the most important factors for investors.
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
RSPH is more affordable in terms of fees with a lower expense ratio than PBE. Investors seeking income may prefer PBE, however, as it offers a substantially higher dividend yield.
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)
RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care Index , providing exposure to 63 holdings. Its largest positions include Moderna at 4.40% of assets, Veeva Systems at 2.51%, and Charles River Laboratories International at 2.23%.
Because it's an equal-weight fund, the largest holdings make up roughly the same share of the portfolio as the smaller holdings. The fund was launched in 2006 and has paid $0.23 per share in dividends over the trailing 12 months.
PBE is more concentrated, holding just 33 companies within the Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index based on factors like earnings growth and price momentum. Its largest positions include Biogen , Gilead Sciences , and Natera . The fund was launched in 2005 and has paid $1.55 per share in dividends over the trailing 12 months.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link .
PBE and RSPH both cover healthcare-related stocks, but their differences in breadth and focus can be a deciding factor for investors choosing between the two.
RSPH focuses on large-cap healthcare stocks that are listed in the S&P 500. While it holds only 63 stocks, its diversification across the broader healthcare sector offers greater variety than the hyper-focused PBE. Also, because RSPH is an equal-weight fund, that can provide more stability since no single stock has the ability to significantly sway
Topics in this story
Gathered from external sources. Rights to this text belong to whoever originally published it.